Less monetary, more fiscal:
- Since the Global Financial Crisis, policy making has relied almost entirely on monetary policy. With the emphasis on reducing budget deficits, expansionary fiscal policy was regarded as impossible. Judging by how conservatively markets are positioned (despite some of the most recent sector rotation moves), a change in fiscal spending and investment is still far from being investors’ base case.
- However, we do not think that the growing chorus and vocal debate about the merits of more generous fiscal policy which has started this year looks likely to go away any time soon. Christine Lagarde, now at the helm of the ECB has been very forthright. Likewise, the message coming from the European Commission too.
- We now see many examples of National governments acting to exploit their strongest finances and cheap funding to boost the fiscal impulse in 2020: a silver lining to the cloud of populism?
- Let’s also see if the entirely consensual view of no change from the ECB – despite new management – turns out to be correct. One should not forget that former president Draghi’s final wave of stimulus was not supported by a sizeable element of the governing council.
Beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing
Cracks are already starting to appear in some of the stocks which have benefited most from a decade of extremely accommodative monetary policy. Where does that leave us in terms of fund positioning as we go into 2020? We understand the logic of buying ‘duration assets’ if bond yields only ever fall, but as we have seen very recently, bond yields can also rise – and ‘duration assets’ has better turn out to be ‘durable’ or else the consensus in the market really do have problem.
Any recent examples? There have been negative regulatory reviews undermining the dividend growth capacity, and therefore the bond proxy status of some utilities. Certain consumer staples stocks and luxury goods companies have been seeing negative earnings revisions and subsequently their share prices have struggled. We are not saying that all ‘Quality’ stocks are disappointing, but rather that the list of poor performers is now long enough to discern a trend – a trend which can very easily continue into 2020.
To our minds, a far better risk reward balance can be found in sectors well away from the market’s focus. This is a similar message to the one we gave a year ago, but the logic is still intact, if not actually stronger today. Given the valuation argument is even more powerful now, it is then worth remembering that in Europe for long-term investors there is a strong correlation between the price you pay for assets and the returns you get.
‘Value’ stocks are in aggregate no longer front and centre in terms of earnings disappointments: indeed, earnings trends are currently stronger at the ‘Value’ end of the market than at the ‘Quality’ end of the spectrum. Macro-economic trends – and the policy making balance – also seems to have turned a corner. For 2020, we see an interesting combination of still loose monetary policy and supportive fiscal trends. To us, this sounds ‘economic growth friendly’ and ‘Growth stock unfriendly’.
We remain valuation focused in our stock analysis and that has led us to favour the ‘Value’ end of the market still going into 2020. We find a sufficiently diverse range of opportunities – industrial, cyclical, financial, defensive – at that end of the stock market to construct portfolios which we believe can offer our investors a very differentiated take on how to make money in Europe.
Daring to be different can ‘pay dividends’ – both literally and metaphorically!
Read more 2020 investment outlooks