More trouble ahead?
The debate now is how the growth-inflation trade-off will pan out in the second half of the year. Inflation should subside significantly. Growth will come lower too, there is no doubt, but by how much is a bigger question.
In recent weeks, markets have started to pay more attention to growth fears again. If growth does disappoint in a meaningful way, then equities could go another leg lower before they reach the bottom, with a fall in earnings contributing more to the decline than multiple contraction. In that recessionary scenario, bonds should start to offer a hedge to stock declines once again. We are seeing evidence that we are close to peak hawkishness and that should allow for bond returns to stabilise.
If earnings disappoint significantly, that could mark the point of capitulation for equity investors. History is clear that equity returns tend to bottom before earnings do. We are looking for evidence of that capitulation before adding equity beta, preferring to get equity exposure via relative value trades. To be clear, we believe that earnings differentials will become a much stronger factor for equity returns in the second half of the year, and that there will be a wide divergence in earnings across sectors.
As attention turns away from inflation to growth in the coming months, bonds and equities should stop falling together. We can see a period in the second half of the year where bonds appreciate, and equities decline.
In the currency markets, the US dollar has performed strongly as US rates have risen more than many other nations. But the strength has come mostly against developed markets rather than emerging market currencies. This can be considered unusual given the equity market sell-off at the same time. Even more unusual is the weak performance of the Japanese Yen. That weakness has provided some cushion to Japanese equities, which have performed better than traditional models might have forecast.
While fears about inflation make way for fears about recession, the US dollar is now catching a haven bid, benefitting from the other side of the smile. Against Sterling, we think that dollar strength will persist, but we are starting to question how much higher it can go against other currencies.
In some of our portfolios, we paired our short EUR-USD too early and are therefore monitoring the moves of the currency pair on the sidelines. Meanwhile, we are paying increased attention to select emerging market currencies, short against the US dollar. We are looking more closely at FX crosses outside of the US dollar for the second half of the year.
No more ‘Fed put’
In the period after the Global Financial Crisis, investors could rely on a Fed put. When financial markets showed any sign of stress, the Fed would step in with supportive policy. That was all well and good when inflation was too low. But those days are over. The inflationary pressures we are living with today mean that the Fed put is gone.
Does that mean you should avoid all risk-assets? In our view, no.
There are still areas that are attractively valued and have strong fundamentals that do not rely on a Fed put to deliver positive returns. High yield and commodity areas remain attractive, in our view.
Sentiment has been hit quite hard this year but, as noted, we have not yet seen all the signs of full-scale capitulation. Equities can, and very likely will, stage significant rallies in the coming months. That said, we are not convinced that we have hit a low point just yet. Earnings estimates need to adjust lower for that to happen.
What will ease inflation?
Higher inflation has surprised most market participants this year and has caused a significant central bank pivot across much of the world. There is evidence that we are approaching peak inflation and peak hawkishness. However, we must be cognisant that facts could change, and our view may be adjusted.
The dominant driver of the surge in inflation this year has been the exponential rise of commodity prices. This has gathered pace on the back of a series of COVID-19-related supply shocks and was further amplified by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Inflationary pressures could be tempered by a further reopening of economies (most notably in China), base effect adjustments, or any signs of easing tensions between Russia and Ukraine.
While the war in Ukraine remains a fluid situation, and difficult to forecast, we have started to observe encouraging signs that other global supply chain disruptions may be easing. For example, available high-frequency data suggests a gradual moderation in global container shipping costs and a continued clearance of US West Coast port backlogs. The recent lockdowns in China have had less impact on supply chains than the lockdowns of 2020 and 2021.
Why haven’t we fallen into recession?
Slower global growth is part of our central thesis, but we see very different recession risks in different markets.
Whether or not we are in a recession depends on the definition you use. Two quarters of negative growth is the often-quoted definition, but the National Bureau of Economic Research uses a more nuanced measure. This states that growth must be negative across a broad range of areas for a recession to be triggered.
The reason we are not in, and possibly not headed for, a recession is that both the consumer and the corporate sector have far stronger balance sheets than ever before – even after the wealth destruction noted previously.
The pandemic forced consumers and some corporates to save. In the US, households still have more than $2 trillion of excess savings sitting in cash or liquid assets. This is allowing them to continue spending, even as real incomes are being squeezed. It is a similar story in most other developed nations.
Because consumers and corporates have taken advantage of exceptionally low rates to refinance debt at longer maturities in recent years, the rise in interest rates is not yet impacting consumers’ ability to service their debt. It is, of course, unpleasant for those purchasing a house to see mortgage costs rising but, for many homeowners, their costs have been fixed for long periods.
There is some nuance to this story by geography, and we do think that the differing debt profiles will have a profound effect on asset returns going forward. This is in contrast to what we have observed in recent years. Companies and households that hold a higher proportion of short-term or floating-rate debt are most vulnerable. We are looking closely at markets such as Australia, where housing debt is very high and tends to carry a variable rate of interest. By contrast, mortgage holders in the US and UK have tended to fix their mortgage rates for longer periods. As such, they are not susceptible to higher rates.