Markets and Economy

Global central bank decisions reflect distinct differences in their economies

Global central bank decisions reflect distinct differences in their economies
Key takeaways
U.S. Federal Reserve.
1

The Fed held rates steady in June but projected two more rate hikes before the end of the year.

European Central Bank.
2

The ECB hiked rates and made it clear that there’s more work to be done in the inflation fight.

Japan and China.
3

Japan maintained its accommodative policy, while China lowered rates to help boost its economy.

Last week was a big one for monetary policy, with four major central banks rendering policy decisions. Their decisions reflect the fact that their respective economies are in very different places.

The U.S. Federal Reserve holds steady for now

The week started with the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) holding rates at current levels. But it was a decidedly hawkish pause, with the Fed suggesting more rate hikes could be coming soon. The Summary of Economic Projections — known as the “dot plot” — showed that the Fed anticipates two more rate hikes this year.

This is borne of concerns that core inflation is too sticky — the Fed revised up its projection for core inflation and revised down its projection for unemployment for the end of the year. Now the dot plot is just each member’s policy prescription — it can be very wrong at times, and it can change significantly over time. You may recall that the dot plot released in December 2021 forecast a median fed funds rate of 0.90% by the end of 2022.1 The Fed couldn’t have been more wrong, as the fed funds rate ended 2022 in the 4.25% – 4.50% range.1

And so markets seemed to shrug off this development, even though Fed Chair Jay Powell shared during his press conference that “nearly all” committee members expected further rate tightening in 2023 would be necessary to bring down inflation.

My read on this hawkish dot plot and Powell’s hawkish words is that they’re intending to stop the market from assuming there will be any rate cuts this year and keep financial conditions from easing. The Fed wants to keep inflation falling — and prevent any reacceleration.

The Fed is faced with a resilient U.S. economy, one that seems to be handling the aggressive tightening cycle very well. The labour market remains surprisingly tight, which could mean that inflation remains stubbornly high. And so the Fed is comfortable with a hawkish pause and the ability to hold further tightening — that “sword of Damocles” — over markets.

Having said that, if the Fed does tighten two more times this year, I believe it really risks overkill — sending the economy into a significant recession. I’m sounding like a broken record, but I’ll say it again: There is a lengthy lag between when monetary policy is implemented and when it actually shows up in the real economy data, which Powell acknowledged in the press conference.

We haven’t seen much of an impact yet because of that lag. That’s why we have to worry so much about overkill. I believe today’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) should heed the words of then-San Francisco Fed President Janet Yellen, who shared the following thoughts during the May 2006 FOMC meeting2:

“I strongly favor a pause in our campaign in order to evaluate the effect of our policy actions to date, unless incoming data after this meeting contain large upside surprises….I do certainly understand the urge to continue raising rates at every meeting until we’re sure the economy is slowing. I still remember very well the 1994 tightening episode, and then, as now, there was a sense of great momentum in the economy, posing significant upside risks to inflation. In circumstances like that, the urge to continue tightening is natural. It is instinctual. Unfortunately, with policy lags such a strategy is a sure recipe for overshooting. If we’re lucky enough to stop at exactly the right point this time, as I believe we actually did in ‘95, we can be sure that it will feel risky at the moment we stop and wise only in retrospect. The risks for policy, in my view, are now two-sided...”

The European Central Bank continues to hike

The European Central Bank (ECB) hiked rates last week with more to come, which I believe is appropriate. The eurozone economy is in a different place than the U.S. economy. The ECB started hiking rates later and has not been as aggressive. In particular, the ECB stuck with the transitory inflation philosophy even longer than the Fed or Bank of England.

It turned out demand was very strong on reopening in the eurozone. Plus, European governments, such as the UK, in effect. supported both household and business spending by insulating their economies from the energy price shock with price controls and budgetary subsidies.

The result was that eurozone (and UK) consumption and business spending have been stronger than expected, and inflation has been higher than expected. Hence, it is no surprise that ECB President Christine Lagarde made it clear that there is more work to be done.

The Bank of Japan stays patient

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) maintained its ultra-accommodative monetary policy at its meeting last week and said it would continue to “patiently” maintain this policy. This surprised some given Japan has experienced higher-than-expected inflation in the past year and the BOJ upwardly revised its expectations for employment and household income.

Japan is an outlier among major developed economies. It’s experiencing its strongest economic growth in decades, and the BOJ may not want to prematurely extinguish it. Not surprisingly, the Japanese yen fell in response.

I suspect the BOJ will need to implement some tweaks to its yield curve control policy in coming months or quarters, but it seems willing to keep its key policy rate lower for longer, tolerating the risks of elevated inflation since it is something of a welcome curiosity for an economy that has been in the doldrums for multiple decades.

The People’s Bank of China seeks to enable economic growth

Then there is the People’s Bank of China, which actually increased monetary policy accommodation while much of the world is tightening.

This makes sense. I believe the economic recovery has long legs. But I also recognize that disappointment with recent economic data has triggered a growing view that China may not have provided enough stimulus during the pandemic relative to other major economies and that its economy could benefit from more stimulus now. The People’s Bank of China is lowering policy rates to help goose the nascent economic recovery.

Up next: The Bank of England

Another major monetary policy decision — from the Bank of England (BOE) — is coming this week. The BOE is between a rock and a hard place, as the UK experiences a weak economy plagued by high inflation — though it has to be said that UK growth has proven more resilient than most everyone expected (including the BOE itself).

I expect the BOE to hike rates even though that would hurt UK households who are already suffering from higher mortgage rates. With Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s government saying it will not provide fiscal help to these households, the BOE — similar to the Bank of Canada, which hiked rates earlier this month — risks hurting the economy more than it helps in its attempts to combat inflation.

Having said that, the BOE probably has the strongest case of any of the major developed market central banks to tighten more aggressively and for longer than had been expected. Inflation is high, and the UK needs the BOE to get a grip on it. This is likely better for gilts and sterling than for UK equities in the shorter term, as UK consumers may well feel the pinch on both real incomes and mortgage payments from high inflation and interest rates.

Investors react to these developments

Taking a step back, the general mood among U.S. investors is becoming more positive. There is a realization that the U.S. is at or very close to the end of its tightening cycle, and the economy has remained resilient — especially the labour market.

U.S. high yield credit spreads have narrowed in recent months, suggesting a greater likelihood of a softer landing for the U.S. economy, which should be positive for the global economy.

And, reflecting a growing sense of investment FOMO — the fear of missing out — the most recent American Association of Individual Investors survey shows the widest bullish-bearish spread since November 2021.3 Monetary policy matters, and it’s generally becoming more supportive of risk assets.

Other investors are not as positive. For example, the Eurozone Sentix Investor Confidence reading has been pessimistic for some time, clocking lower in the last two weeks.4 A contributing factor is likely the ECB’s hawkish monetary policy stance. In addition, a lot of negative sentiment is likely priced into Chinese equities already, and they are trading at the low end of their historical valuation range — despite more monetary and fiscal stimulus in the offing.

Negative sentiment presents opportunities. There should be a growing realization that other major Western developed central banks — not just the U.S. — are at or nearing the end of their tightening cycles, while the Bank of Japan and the People’s Bank of China are maintaining or increasing their accommodative monetary policies. I believe this is a time to be looking for attractively valued assets with upside potential for the next year and beyond.

With contributions from Arnab Das and David Chao

Footnotes

  • 1

    Source: U.S. Federal Reserve

  • 2

    Source: FOMC minutes, May 10, 2006

  • 3

    Source: American Association of Individual Investors, June 15, 2023. The AAII's Investor Sentiment Survey shows the percentage of investors who are bullish, bearish, or neutral on stocks.

  • 4

    Source: Sentix, GmbH, June 5, 2023