Insight Market implications of US conflict with Iran
Key takeaways
-
Iran doesn’t produce that much oil but can impact world energy markets in other ways.
-
Geopolitical uncertainty tends to result in oil price volatility, yet historical events haven’t impacted markets as much as many believed.
-
Oil flows are largely bypassing the Strait of Hormuz.
The current US conflict with Iran has been a source of volatility in crude oil prices, but the scale of economic and market disruption has been far more muted than some commentators initially expected. Given historical data on past US conflicts in the region and tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, the future is uncertain. But historical experience may provide insight into potential market outcomes.
Oil flows are largely bypassing the Strait of Hormuz
A common concern about the conflict with Iran is the loss of oil and other energy resources from the global market. Prior to the conflict, about a fifth of the world’s oil supply was transported through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow channel out of the Persian Gulf. However, we estimate about 80% of the oil is still flowing through a combination of US navy escorted vessels and other channels such as land-based pipeline routes.1 This has helped limit the headline impact of the events in the Middle East.
The economy is less sensitive to oil supply than in the past
The energy intensity of economic activity is not what it once was. If we measure economic activity versus the amount of oil an economy consumes, we find that the oil intensity of global GDP is around half what it was in 1990 — and far lower compared to 1970.2This means that changes in oil prices are less impactful than they once were. We view this as a mitigating factor in considering the impact of the US-Iran conflict.
Falling oil demand and inventory drawdowns helped stabilise energy prices
Early in the outbreak of the conflict, major economies mobilised their strategic stockpiles to alleviate potential shortages in the global oil market.3 These drawdowns have helped minimise potential disruptions from the conflict. While higher oil prices have exerted upward pressure on inflation this year, we expect the worst of the oil price movements are behind us. Stable or lower energy prices should help see inflation stabilise or even trend lower.
Geopolitical uncertainty hasn’t impacted the markets as much as many people believe
While geopolitical uncertainty like this often leads to temporary volatility, it hasn’t historically weighed significantly on longer-term stock market returns. The MSCI World Index, dating back to the 1970s, has averaged a 7.8% gain in the year following a peak in the Geopolitical Risk Index, which generally spikes during periods of global conflict.4 This has been a helpful template in navigating this conflict as well, in our view.
Related insights
-
Invesco’s midyear outlook webinar looks at how markets are reacting to a tumultuous global economy and what experts are doing to navigate it.18 June 2026 -
ETF March European ETF Flows
Benjamin Jones, Chris Mellor, Paul Syms
Middle East tensions unsettled markets in March, yet European ETFs attracted US$12bn, driven by diversification away from the US and cautious demand for cash and short-duration fixed income.21 April 2026 -
Investment Outlook Equities: A growing case for diversification
Invesco
While 2025 brought uncertainty, the aftermath also brings new opportunities for the year ahead. Our experts discuss the potential this new landscape may bring in 2026.1 December 2025
EMEA5877441/2026
Change site/location