Insight

China, Explained Series: Evaluating Belt and Road bonds using an ESG lens

China, Explained Series: Evaluating Belt and Road bonds using an ESG lens

Yifei Ding,Senior Portfolio Manager

Anthony Xiao,CPM, Fixed Income

The case for B&R bonds

As emerging economies begin to recover from the pandemic, investors can consider investing in Belt and Road (B&R) bonds. These bonds, used to finance infrastructure projects related to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), may offer better risk-adjusted returns with lower volatility particularly given the current low-yield environment. Since 2017, when the BRI was written into the constitution of Chinese Communist Party, the iBoxx Belt and Road Index has for the most part outperformed both the J.P. Morgan Emerging Market Bond Index (EMBI) and the Corporate Emerging Market Bond Index (CEMBI) (see Chart 1).

Chart 1: Performance of iBoxx Belt and Road Index relative to JP Morgan EMBI and CEMBI
Chart 1: Performance of iBoxx Belt and Road Index relative to JP Morgan EMBI and CEMBI
Source: Bloomberg, data as of June 28, 2021

China has demonstrated its commitment to the BRI both in their 14th Five-Year Plan and annual Two Sessions meetings. As of early 2019, the estimated total eligible size of the B&R bond market had already reached over USD 1.5 trillion1. The recent lockdowns and social distancing measures enacted as a consequence of the Covid-19 outbreak have no doubt impacted the progress of BRI projects.2 However going forward, emerging economies will still need to meet significant infrastructure funding needs to drive growth (see Chart 2) and are also looking to offset the decline in GDP caused by the pandemic. Economic improvement of these economies will benefit both government and corporate bond issuers along the B&R.

Chart 2: Rising infrastructure investment gap in emerging market countries
Chart 2: Rising infrastructure investment gap in emerging market countries
Source: Global Infrastructure Hub, as of 30 June 2020.
Inroads into sustainable development

In recent years Beijing regulators have been making inroads in promoting sustainable development in the context of the BRI. China’s Ministry of Finance released a debt sustainability framework (DSF) at the second Belt and Road forum held in April 2019.3 Financial institutions in China and other BRI countries are encouraged to use the DSF to manage their debt risks and engage in more disciplined lending. Beijing has also announced several green finance policies and encouraged green bond issuances in recent years that can be applied to BRI projects.

Whereas funding for the BRI has typically originated from government entities, the private sector is now playing a more active role in financing these developments.4 B&R infrastructure projects are also attracting growing multilateral interest. In March 2019, the Ministry of Finance together with several multilateral development banks set up the Multilateral Cooperation Center for Development Finance (MCDF) demonstrating China’s interest in promoting multilateral projects under the BRI.5 At the same time, other nations are competing with China to invest in BRI countries. In November 2019 at the Indo-Pacific Business Forum, the US alongside Japan and Australia founded the Blue Dot Network6, a private-led infrastructure investment scheme intended for the Indo-Pacific region.7 The wider range of financing options, greater external competition and increasing multilateralization of the BRI are all likely to improve the sustainability and transparency of B&R projects over time.

 

Where we see opportunities in B&R bonds

We believe that considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors are critical when evaluating B&R bonds. Our team follows a fundamentals-first approach and systematically considers ESG factors to avoid the “worst-in-class” countries and corporate issuers. For example, on the sovereign side, data shows that there has been better financial market performance from EM sovereign bonds that are more highly rated from an ESG perspective (see Chart 3). We view ESG as a driver of alpha and therefore favor issuers that are making notable improvements in their ESG disclosures and metrics over time.

Chart 3: Emerging Market sovereign bond returns for past three years by MSCI ESG rating
Chart 3: Emerging Market sovereign bond returns for past three years by MSCI ESG rating
Source: MSCI, J.P. Morgan, Bloomberg, Invesco. Performance data as of June 8, 2021. MSCI ESG rating is as of December 31, 2018. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

In the next half year, we see opportunities in countries that have good diplomatic relations with both China and Western countries. We also favor China USD bonds with a domestic focus or those that have strong government support. In terms of sector allocation, we see opportunities in the infrastructure sector covering diversified industries such as power utilities, energy, transportation, telecommunications, affordable housing, and construction.

Investment risks

The value of investments and any income will fluctuate (this may partly be the result of exchange rate fluctuations) and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

When investing in less developed countries, you should be prepared to accept significantly large fluctuations in value.

Investment in certain securities listed in China can involve significant regulatory constraints that may affect liquidity and/or investment performance.



1 Invesco, based on Invesco B&R relevance compliance check, as of 25 February 2019. Based on current market conditions and subject to change without notice.
2 The Belt and Road Initiative 2021 Survey – The impact of Covid‑19 on the BRI, June 2021, https://www.centralbanking.com/central-banks/economics/7835241/the-belt-and-road-initiative-2021-survey-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-the-bri
3 China’s New Debt Sustainability Framework Is Largely Borrowed from the World Bank and IMF. Here’s Why That Could Be a Problem., July 2019, https://www.cgdev.org/blog/chinas-new-debt-sustainability-framework-largely-borrowed-world-bank-and-imf-heres-why-could
4 China’s Belt and Road Initiative in a Post-Pandemic World, June 2020, https://www.invesco.com/ch/en/insights/the-belt-and-road-initiative-in-a-post-pandemic-world.html
5 Broadening the Belt and Road: China’s new fund for multilateral cooperation, September 2020, https://odi.org/en/insights/broadening-the-belt-and-road-chinas-new-fund-for-multilateral-cooperation/
6 Blue Dot Network, https://www.state.gov/blue-dot-network/  
7 China’s belt and road plan: can the US find an alternative route?, May 2021, https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3131881/chinas-belt-and-road-plan-can-us-find-alternative-route

当資料ご利用上のご注意

当資料は情報提供を目的として、インベスコ・アセット・マネジメント株式会社(以下、「当社」)のグループに属する運用プロフェッショナルが英文で作成したものであり、法令に基づく開示書類でも特定ファンド等の勧誘資料でもありません。内容には正確を期していますが、必ずしも完全性を当社が保証するものではありません。また、当資料は信頼できる情報に基づいて作成されたものですが、その情報の確実性あるいは完結性を表明するものではありません。当資料に記載されている内容は既に変更されている場合があり、また、予告なく変更される場合があります。当資料には将来の市場の見通し等に関する記述が含まれている場合がありますが、それらは資料作成時における作成者の見解であり、将来の動向や成果を保証するものではありません。また、当資料に示す見解は、インベスコの他の運用チームの見解と異なる場合があります。過去のパフォーマンスや動向は将来の収益や成果を保証するものではありません。当社の事前の承認なく、当資料の一部または全部を使用、複製、転用、配布等することを禁じます。

IM2021-046

そのほかの投資関連情報はこちらをご覧ください。https://www.invesco.com/jp/ja/institutional/insights.html