Municipals Thoughts from the Municipal Bond Desk
Key takeaways
-
The Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index bounced back from September losses with their strongest month in three years and best October since the index was incepted.
-
Falling Treasury yields helped fuel the rebound as investors sought safe haven amid technology stock declines and unexpectedly high inflation. Favorable market technicals provided additional support.
-
Demand for municipal bonds remained robust, although flows shifted toward ETFs and away from mutual funds, contrary to historical patterns. The shift may partly reflect tax-loss harvesting following September’s selloff.
Tim: Municipal investors have seen sharp swings over the past two months, with September’s selloff giving way to a significant October rebound.
Mark: Yes, it’s been a wild ride. After bruising declines in September, the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index staged a strong recovery during October, recording its strongest performance in three years and its best October performance since the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index began tracking returns in 1980!1 Investment grade tax-exempt bonds returned 3.85% in October, retracing much of their September’s losses.1 The rally was driven by declining US Treasury yields, as investors sought perceived safe havens amid a drawdown in technology stocks and higher-than-expected inflation data. Supply-and-demand conditions reinforced the market’s momentum. New issuance moderated in October, with roughly $48 billion brought to market compared to the $55 billion issued in September.1 At the same time, investor demand remained strong, allowing the market to digest the lighter supply. I think we are going to see a similar technical picture in November, with about $33 billion in new issuance due to a slowdown in refunding activity, the effects of the election cycle, and the holiday calendar.2 Demand should be well supported by historically high tax-exempt yields.
Tim: Speaking of demand, while flows have stayed positive, they have been focused on municipal ETFs.
Mark: Instead of on mutual funds, yes. It’s a notable divergence. Historically, mutual funds have received the lion’s share of investment inflows. However, looking at the week ended October 28, the municipal market saw a total of $1.7 billion of inflows, with $3.5 billion going into ETFs and $1.8 billion coming out of open-end mutual funds.2 It was the eighth consecutive week with this kind of divergence.2 The plausible explanation for this is that investors used their mutual fund holdings to engage in tax-loss harvesting following the September selloff. Then, in my view, they put their money back to work in municipals, choosing to reposition their portfolios using ETFs. If history is any guide, we may see that divergence reverse in January and February. In the tax-loss-harvesting seasons in 2022 and 2023, mutual funds saw outflows and ETFs saw inflows. The following January and February flow picture then reversed, with ETFs seeing outflows and mutual funds receiving inflows.2 Regardless, this year’s overall inflows have helped to absorb record new issuance of $517 billion year to date October 28, which is 5% higher than the same period last year.3
Tim: What are your thoughts on how the midterm election results will affect munis?
Mark: Time will tell, Tim, but markets usually focus on fundamentals, not political parties. And one party’s control of congress does not indicate where markets will go. So, in my opinion, economic growth, inflation, Federal Reserve policy, and interest rates will have more of an impact on munis than this election outcome.
Read the complete article, including munis by the numbers.
Related insights
Important Information
NA6095871
Municipal securities are subject to the risk that legislative or economic conditions could affect an issuer’s ability to make payments of principal and/or interest.
Junk bonds involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the issuer’s credit quality.
The value of investments and any income will fluctuate (this may partly be the result of exchange rate fluctuations) and investors may not get back the full amount invested. The values of junk bonds fluctuate more than those of high-quality bonds and can decline significantly over short time periods.
All fixed income securities are subject to two types of risk: credit risk and interest rate risk. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the issuer of a security will be unable to make interest payments and/ or repay the principal on its debt. Interest rate risk refers to the risk that bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise and vice versa.
Municipal bonds are issued by state and local government agencies to finance public projects and services. They typically pay interest that is tax-free in their state of issuance. Because of their tax benefits, municipal bonds usually offer lower pre-tax yields than similar taxable bonds.
All data as of November 4, 2026, unless otherwise stated.
All data provided by Invesco unless otherwise noted.
Businesses in the energy sector may be adversely affected by foreign, federal or state regulations governing energy production, distribution and sale as well as supply-and-demand for energy resources. Short-term volatility in energy prices may cause share price fluctuations.
The opinions expressed are those of the author, are based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco investment professionals.
Invesco does not provide tax advice. The tax information contained herein is general and is not exhaustive by nature. It is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer under US federal tax laws. Federal and state tax laws are complex and constantly changing. Investors should always consult their own legal or tax professional for information concerning their individual situation.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. An investment cannot be made into an index.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations.
There is no guarantee the outlooks mentioned will come to pass.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or eliminate the risk of loss.
There are risks involved with investing in ETFs, including possible loss of money. Index-based ETFs are not actively managed. Actively managed ETFs do not necessarily seek to replicate the performance of a specified index. Both index-based and actively managed ETFs are subject to risks similar to stocks, including those related to short selling and margin maintenance. Ordinary brokerage commissions apply. The Fund's return may not match the return of the Index. The Fund is subject to certain other risks.
Leaving Invesco.com
This link takes you to a site not affiliated with Invesco. The site is for informational purposes only. Invesco does not guarantee nor take any responsibility for any of the content.
Change site/location