Insight

Latest developments regarding Chinese ADRs

Latest developments regarding Chinese ADRs

1)  What is the latest development of the Chinese ADRs issue?

  • There are positive developments in removing the overhang on US-listed Chinese companies.
  • Over the weekend, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has initiated a revision on “Provisions on Strengthening Confidentiality and Archives Administration of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies". We believe this is an important step for China to help resolve the US ADR issue given this has been going on for a long time. Previously, US authorities found it challenging to conduct a comprehensive review for Chinese companies under the Foreign Company Accountability Act.
  • The revised provisions deleted “Onsite inspection should be conducted by Chinese regulatory body or rely on their inspection result”. The revision indicates China’s willingness to assist companies listed offshore to collaborate with the US audit requirement.
  • It also indicates that Chinese authorities are supportive of business developments in the global financial market.
  • Following this development, we believe the likelihood of de-listing has decreased, potentially removing a significant overhang for Chinese companies.
  • We will continue to monitor the response from US regulators and more details on the full access on audit reports of foreign-listed companies.
  • We believe this positive development could trigger a short-term rebound on the stock prices of ADR.

2)  What happened to Chinese companies listed in the US prior to the latest development?

  • The Foreign Company Accountability Act by US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) aims to enhance the audit quality of companies in foreign jurisdictions in general and is not specific to Chinese companies.
  • The issue is that the US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) found it challenging to conduct a comprehensive review given the Chinese jurisdiction.
  • It is not that Chinese companies are not willing or unable to provide such information.
  • While this matter has been going on for a long time, this has recently received further investors' attention as US SEC announced the first batch of five non-inspection Chinese companies last month.
  • These five Chinese companies are named by SEC because they are the first to file annual reports with the regulator, and we may see more companies added to the list.
  • It is worth noting that most of the large US-listed Chinese companies already have a secondary listing in Hong Kong.

3)  What are the key implications should Chinese companies are to be de-listed in the US?

Investors have two critical questions: i) whether the Hong Kong equity market can absorb all the fundraising due to Chinese equities' homecoming and ii) whether international money will follow.

i) Will the Hong Kong market be under liquidity pressure?
It is of our view that liquidity pressure on the Hong Kong equity market should be minimal, given the following:

  • The share conversion procedures for company listing in Hong Kong do not involve buying and selling. It is a mere re-registering of shares to the Hong Kong Central Clearing and Automated Settlement System (CCASS) system.  
  • Although some companies may decide to issue new shares while doing the secondary listing, historically, most large companies only issue a small portion (~3% to 5%) of their market cap as new shares. 
  • Dual-primary listed stocks may be added to Southbound Connect, attracting further inflows from China's onshore investors.  
  • The 30 largest Chinese companies’ US ADRs with turnover over US$10mn, have a total market cap of USD284bn. Together they account for 5.2% of the Hong Kong exchange's currently listed market cap or 5.4% of the current turnover. Many large ADRs are already dual-listed in Hong Kong, so the impact should be minimal.

ii) Will all international capital flow follow?

  • We believe not all international capital flows will follow should the Chinese companies are listed only in Hong Kong. 
  • The turnover velocity of the Hong Kong exchange on a relative basis was lower than the US and Mainland China. For companies currently dual-listed in the US and Hong Kong, a large portion of the trades are conducted in the US. The turnover is likely to be lower after the migration.

4) What is the outlook for the ADR issue?
  • The US set a 2024 deadline for kicking non-compliant companies, i.e. the first de-listing (if it happens) will not occur until 2024.
  • There is still time for the regulator on both sides to work out a resolution. The matter is usually resolved closer to the deadline.
  • The key is that authorities are willing to work towards a resolution. The recent announcement by the Chinese regulators has demonstrated China's willingness to work on the issues.
  • Therefore, we are hopeful to see positive outcomes come along in removing the de-listing risks.

Investment risks

The value of investments and any income will fluctuate (this may partly be the result of exchange rate fluctuations) and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

When investing in less developed countries, you should be prepared to accept significantly large fluctuations in value.

Investment in certain securities listed in China can involve significant regulatory constraints that may affect liquidity and/or investment performance.

Footnotes

  • 1

    Bloomberg, HSBC, data as of January 2022

当資料ご利用上のご注意

当資料は情報提供を目的として、インベスコ・アセット・マネジメント株式会社(以下、「当社」)のグループに属する運用プロフェッショナルが英文で作成したものであり、法令に基づく開示書類でも金融商品取引契約の締結の勧誘資料でもありません。内容には正確を期していますが、必ずしも完全性を当社が保証するものではありません。また、当資料は信頼できる情報に基づいて作成されたものですが、その情報の確実性あるいは完結性を表明するものではありません。当資料に記載されている内容は既に変更されている場合があり、また、予告なく変更される場合があります。当資料には将来の市場の見通し等に関する記述が含まれている場合がありますが、それらは資料作成時における作成者の見解であり、将来の動向や成果を保証するものではありません。また、当資料に示す見解は、インベスコの他の運用チームの見解と異なる場合があります。過去のパフォーマンスや動向は将来の収益や成果を保証するものではありません。当社の事前の承認なく、当資料の一部または全部を使用、複製、転用、配布等することを禁じます。

IM2022-023

そのほかの投資関連情報はこちらをご覧ください。https://www.invesco.com/jp/ja/institutional/insights.html