Investment grade Investment grade outlook: Insights for October
Get insight on why Treasury rates moved higher, markets reacted in seemingly counterintuitive ways, and investment grade demand remained strong.
October saw solid returns for investment-grade bonds, driven by solid fundamentals, good liquidity, and positive carry.
A hawkish tone from Fed Chairman Powell triggered a selloff and led the markets to price in fewer rate cuts in 2026.
We’re running a bit longer on the front-end of duration and continue to lean into high-quality sectors with strong fundamentals.
October was another positive month for fixed income. The Bloomberg US Corporate Bond Index rose about 38 basis points (bps), which put it up 7.29% year to date.1 The Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index rose 62 bps, up 6.80% year to date.2 But the Federal Reserve (Fed) interest rate cut led to a selloff. What does it mean for investment grade bonds and the economy? We answer this and more in our Q&A on how we’re navigating the bond market in November.
Craig: October was a positive month, but it might have been an even better month if bonds hadn’t sold off by roughly 75 bps-1% after the Fed cut rates at the end of the month. What was driving the roughly 1.5% total returns before the Fed meeting?
Matt: Credit spreads were basically unchanged month-to-date in October, up until the Fed meeting. Spreads have already been tight, but that has been justified by solid fundamentals and good liquidity — both of which remain intact. Rates were already lower by about 12–20 bps across the yield curve, driven by expectations of multiple Fed cuts and some concern about softer economic momentum. But the real driver of total return continues to be positive carry. With starting yields in the 4.5–5% range, your baseline return from carry is about 40 bps per month.
Craig: The Fed cut rates by 25 bps, which was exactly what the market was pricing. Yet rates and stocks sold off and spreads widened. So clearly, investors didn’t love what they heard. What do you think spooked markets?
Matt: The Fed-issued Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement noted that inflation had moved up since earlier in the year and remained elevated. It emphasized uncertainty around the economic outlook and downside risks to employment. But the key line was Chairman Jerome Powell saying December is not a foregone conclusion for another cut. So even though we got a cut — and quantitative tightening (QT) ends in December — the meeting was still interpreted as hawkish. Markets are now pricing fewer cuts next year.
Craig: There’s significant disagreement among Fed officials on the path of rates and the economy. We’ve also heard mirror views from financial professionals and clients. One financial professional called this the “owl market” because everyone’s looking in all directions, waiting for something to go wrong. But nothing has yet. Can you explain your views and how you’re positioned?
Matt: We think the economy is still fundamentally solid. Consumers have slowed a bit but remain healthy, corporate balance sheets look good, and we’re not seeing the kinds of excesses you’d expect before a downturn. So our base case isn’t a recession, it’s a moderation. But even in that environment, policy rates don’t need to stay this restrictive. We think the Fed is already effectively in restrictive territory. As inflation gradually drifts lower, it has room to bring the policy rate down toward something closer to neutral, which is around 3%. So we expect a world where growth is OK but rates migrate lower. That means we’re running a bit longer with bonds at the front-end of duration and the yield curve than we had earlier in the year, and continue to lean into high-quality spread sectors where fundamentals remain strong.
Craig: Whether we get a slowdown or the economy continues to do well, we believe both scenarios are positive for bonds. Investors must agree based on the significant flows into the asset class.3 But much of that has been going into passive, even though active managers historically have regularly added value in fixed income.4
Emily: More than 20 years of rolling three-year periods of data shows that at pretty much any fee load, there has been an advantage to being in active fixed income for a core plus mandate.5 A core plus fund holds a core of investment grade securities and adds a layer of higher-yielding bonds to potentially increase returns. Plus, with the upcoming 2026 market duration mandate, a US Treasury clearing regulation requiring a large portion of US Treasury cash and repurchase agreement (repo) market transactions to be cleared through an SEC-approved central clearing agency, it’s potentially challenging for long-term investors to make a case for fixed income outside of active.
Get insight on why Treasury rates moved higher, markets reacted in seemingly counterintuitive ways, and investment grade demand remained strong.
The Federal Reserve’s next move is on investors’ minds. What could a rate cut mean for investment grade bonds? We answer this question and more.
What AI-driven earnings, potential rate cuts, tight credit spreads, and mergers and acquisitions activity may mean for bond portfolio positioning.
Get the latest information and insights from our portfolio managers, market strategists, and investment experts.
Important information
NA5005285
Image: maydays / Getty
All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Investments cannot be made directly in an index.
This does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy or product for a particular investor. Investors should consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.
A basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point.
Credit spread is the difference in yield between bonds of similar maturity but with different credit quality.
Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of the price (the value of principal) of a fixed income investment to a change in interest rates. Duration is expressed as a number of years.
Fixed income investments are subject to the credit risk of the issuer and the effects of changing interest rates. Interest rate risk refers to the risk that bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise and vice versa. An issuer may be unable to meet interest and/or principal payments, thereby causing its instruments to decrease in value and lowering the issuer’s credit rating.
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is a committee of the Federal Reserve Board that meets regularly to set monetary policy, including the interest rates that are charged to banks.
Hawkish describes a central bank or policymaker's preference for a tighter monetary policy, typically to combat inflation.
High yield bonds, or junk bonds, involve a greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the issuer’s credit quality. The values of junk bonds fluctuate more than those of high quality bonds and can decline significantly over short time periods.
Inflation is the rate at which the general price level for goods and services is increasing.
A policy rate is the rate used by central banks to implement or signal their monetary policy stance.
Positive carry is an investing strategy that uses leverage to increase your returns.
Carry is the expected return from holding a bond, assuming its price remains stable. Bond income/yields are higher than the cost of financing.
Quantitative tightening (QT) is a monetary policy used by central banks to normalize balance sheets.
Spread represents the difference between two values or asset returns.
In general, stock values fluctuate, sometimes widely, in response to activities specific to the company as well as general market, economic, and political conditions.
Tightening monetary policy includes actions by a central bank to curb inflation.
The yield curve plots interest rates at a set point of time for bonds of equal credit quality but differing maturity dates in order to project future interest rate changes and economic activity.
The opinions referenced above are those of the author as of Nov. 21, 2025. These comments should not be construed as recommendations, but as an illustration of broader themes. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions; there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations.
This link takes you to a site not affiliated with Invesco. The site is for informational purposes only. Invesco does not guarantee nor take any responsibility for any of the content.