Markets and Economy

Above the Noise: Rethinking 2025 narratives

Close-up shot of a hand holding a phone with a news article on it.

Key takeaways

Fed independence

1

Investors have been told to worry if Kevin Hassett becomes Fed chair, but the market doesn’t appear concerned.

Magnificent 2?

2

Many assume that the market’s success hinges on the Magnificent 7 stocks, but five lagged the S&P 500 so far this year.

Mortgage rates

3

Will rate cuts lower mortgage rates? The US 10-year Treasury, fed funds, and mortgage rates suggest that they may stay over 6%.

“I love when they drop the ball in Times Square. It’s a nice reminder that we all dropped the ball at some point this year.”1 Hopefully, Above the Noise didn’t drop it too often. In fact, we spent some time looking back to see what we focused on most throughout the year.

Here’s what rose to the top, and what we said about each theme along the way:

No. 5: Recession risk

Macro signals, including tight credit spreads2 and loose lending standards,3 point to low near‑term recession risk.

No. 4: US dollar and international diversification

A moderating US dollar4 and shifting global cycles favor diversification into non‑US assets, with Europe and emerging markets offering relative value.5

No. 3: Tariffs and policy uncertainty

Tariffs and policy uncertainty could create a one‑time price shock and dampen sentiment and business investment, but are unlikely to trigger a recession in our view. Trade policy clarity plus US Federal Reserve (Fed) easing may be the remedy.

No. 2: Fed policy and inflation expectations

Anchored inflation expectations6 and the Fed’s easing bias provide a supportive backdrop for risk assets.

Should we pause for a long-distance dedication?

Finally, the biggest focus for Above the Noise in 2025 (drum roll):

No. 1: AI boom and market breadth

Artificial intelligence (AI) spending is substantial, in our view, but not a dot‑com replay;7 valuations are elevated, yet poor timing tools,8 and market breadth is broadening beyond megacaps.9

Not bad. To paraphrase Casey Kasem, we’ll keep our feet on the ground and keep reaching for the stars.

It may be confirmation bias, but…

…the market doesn’t appear particularly concerned about the next Fed chair. Investors have been told to worry about Kevin Hassett stepping into the role. After all, he would be the first to come directly from a senior White House position without prior service as a Fed governor. That sounds unprecedented, but remember that Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen both chaired the Council of Economic Advisers before serving as Fed governors and then chairs.

So, is the market worried? Stocks are near record highs.10 Inflation expectations have remained contained.11 The dollar stabilized months ago.12 In short, there’s not much anxiety.

Why? 

  • First, the Fed is already poised to lower rates.13
  • Second, Hassett wouldn’t set policy alone. The chair only has one vote.
  • Third, the rentier class that effectively runs this country doesn’t like inflation and would likely push back, especially if midterm elections don’t go well for the GOP.

This isn’t to say that Fed independence isn’t critical. It is. But this may end up being little more than a tempest in a teapot.

If it bleeds, it leads

Much has been made of a recent MIT study claiming AI can replace 12% of US jobs.14 Sounds terrifying, right? But it doesn’t mean AI is about to wipe out 12% of the workforce tomorrow. What it really means is that AI has the capability to perform roughly 12% of the tasks in your job. That’s not doom and gloom. That’s efficiency. AI can help me write paragraphs, edit my work, and even run analysis. But it doesn’t share my opinions or replicate my incredible wit (my mom swears I have it). It doesn’t hop on planes to meet clients. It certainly doesn’t flash my dazzling smile on TV (again, mom’s words). So, does AI have the skills to do 12% of my job? Sure. But that headline was way scarier than reality.

Chartered territory

Investors often view the Magnificent 7 stocks as a single, unified force, assuming they move in lockstep and that the broader market’s success depends on their leadership. This perception is understandable given their outsized weight in major indexes,15 but it oversimplifies reality. In fact, the narrative doesn’t match the numbers. Most of these stocks are underperforming the S&P 500 this year.16 Meanwhile, the Bloomberg S&P 500 ex-Magnificent 7 Index has gained more than 16%,17 underscoring that market strength has been far broader than the story suggests.

It was said

“The word ‘affordability’ is a con job by the Democrats.”18

– President Donald Trump

“A lot of that is not the current rate of inflation. A lot of that is just embedded higher costs due to higher inflation in 2022 and ’23”19 

– Fed Chairman Jerome Powell

I think they’re saying the same thing. President Trump would be right to remind voters that inflation spiked during the Biden administration, though in fairness, both parties contributed by pumping money into the system during and after the pandemic. Powell is also correct that inflation peaked in 2022.20 It’s the embedded higher costs that are the crux of the issue.

Policymakers focus on the inflation rate, while American consumers tend to focus on actual prices. And prices have remained elevated, about 10% higher than when inflation peaked.21 That translates to roughly 3% a year, which the nation’s central bankers are considering, for the most part, to be price stability. The challenge for politicians is that driving prices lower can’t be the goal. Deflation would be disastrous, triggering falling wages, collapsing demand, and further declines in prices. That’s a vicious cycle. Instead, what we need is for wages to keep pace. The data suggests they have, at least in aggregate,22 but many Americans clearly don’t feel it.

Since you asked (part 1)

Q: How do you rationalize the amount of business investment that’s related to AI?

A: The demand for AI intelligence is accelerating at an unprecedented pace. Consider this: ChatGPT reached 100 million users in just two months, far faster than platforms like Facebook, which took four and a half years to hit that milestone.23

Businesses, including hyperscalers such as Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta, are pouring capital into building the computing power needed to fuel AI innovation. Fortunately, most of these companies, Oracle being a notable exception, maintain net debt (cash minus debt) to EBITDA ratios close to zero.24 In short, they have the capacity to borrow to fund investment.

The challenge, over time, will be balancing massive capital expenditure against the uncertain timing of revenue. That challenge will likely be even greater for businesses without the cash reserves hyperscalers enjoy. Timing will matter. Ultimately, it’s a race to command the most computing power.

Since you asked (part 2)

Q: If the Fed continues to cut interest rates, should we expect mortgage rates to fall?

A: Unfortunately, I wouldn’t count on it. Let’s do the math.

  • Markets are already pricing a fed funds rate of 3% by the end of 2026.25
  • Historically, the spread between the fed funds rate and the 10-year US Treasury rate averages 130 basis points.26 With the 10-year US Treasury rate recently trading in the 4.10%–4.20% range,27 it’s already 110–120 basis points (bps) above where the market expects the fed funds rate to be at the end of next year. 
  • Meanwhile, the spread between the 10-year US Treasury and mortgage rates has historically averaged 185 bps.28

That math still puts mortgage rates north of 6%, give or take a few basis points. And be careful about wishing for the fed funds rate and 10-year US Treasury rate to plunge, because that would likely suggest a significantly worse economic outcome than is currently expected.

Phone a friend

How concerned should investors be about the amount borrowed by US businesses? I posed the question to Matt Brill, Head of US Investment Grade Credit at Invesco. His response:

“We’re starting from a position of strength. Banks remain fundamentally sound and continue to improve their balance sheets,29 and the US economy is on a solid footing.30 That’s an encouraging backdrop. Most businesses in the post-COVID-19 period have been cautious. They’ve been holding back on borrowing amid waves of uncertainty, including the pandemic, the inflation surge, and higher rates in 2022, the Silicon Valley Bank failure in 2023, and tariffs in 2025. In each case, recession fears never truly materialized, but prudence prevailed. Today, companies are feeling more confident. Some are even increasing leverage to pursue acquisitions and strategic growth. Still, a general sense of caution persists when it comes to borrowing.”

On the road again

Above the Noise is heading about 1,250 miles south, where it’s about 60 degrees warmer, to celebrate the holidays. Wishing you all a joyful season, and here’s to a healthy, happy, and prosperous 2026!

  • 1

    Regarded as a widely circulated humorous New Year’s quip, but it doesn’t have a well-documented attribution to a specific person.

  • 2

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025, based on the option-adjusted spread of the Bloomberg US Corporate Bond Index.

  • 3

    Source: US Federal Reserve, Oct. 31, 2025, based on the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey.

  • 4

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025, based on the US Dollar Index, which measures the value of the US dollar versus a trade-weighted basket of currencies. The US Dollar Index has declined 9.6% this year, with most of the decline coming in the first half of the year.

  • 5

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025, based on the price-to-earnings ratio of the MSCI Europe Index (16.7x) and the MSCI Emerging Market Index (16.6x) compared to that of the S&P 500 Index (27.2x).

  • 6

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025, based on the 3-year US Treasury inflation breakeven. A breakeven inflation rate is a market-derived estimate of future inflation, calculated by comparing the yield on a standard government bond (nominal) to the yield on a Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) of the same maturity.

  • 7

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Nov. 30, 2025, based on the S&P 500 Information Technology Sector capital expenditure to cash flow ratio.

  • 8

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025, based on the price-to-earnings ratio of the S&P 500 Index (27.2x). Historically, the R-squared, the coefficient of determination, between valuations and future returns is 0.50 over 10 years and 0.07 over one year.

  • 9

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025, based on the percent of stocks on the New York Stock Exchange trading above their 200-day moving average.

  • 10

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 11, 2025, based on the S&P 500 Index, which closed at 6,901 on Dec. 11, 2025, and set a new all-time high.

  • 11

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025, based on the 3-year US Treasury inflation breakeven. A breakeven inflation rate is a market-derived estimate of future inflation, calculated by comparing the yield on a standard government bond (nominal) to the yield on a Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) of the same maturity.

  • 12

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025, based on the US Dollar Index, which measures the value of the US dollar versus a trade-weighted basket of currencies. The US Dollar Index has declined 9.6% this year, with most of the decline coming in the first half of the year. 

  • 13

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025, based on fed funds implied rates.

  • 14

    Source: “The Iceberg Index: Measuring Workforce Exposure in the AI Economy,” Oct. 29, 2025.

  • 15

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025. The Magnificent 7 refers to Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla, which currently represent 34.54% of the S&P 500 Index.

  • 16

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 14, 2025, based on the year-to-date returns of Alphabet (64.03%), Amazon (3.10%), Apple (11.62%), Meta (10.28%), Microsoft (14.37%), Nvidia (30.36%), and Tesla (13.65%) compared to the S&P 500 Index (17.49%).

  • 17

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 14, 2025, based on the year-to-date return of the Bloomberg 500 excluding Magnificent 7 Index (16.07%).

  • 18

    Source: PBS, “Trump says the word ‘affordability’ is a ‘con job’ by the Democrats,” Dec. 2, 2025.

  • 19

    Source: NPR, “Federal Reserve votes to cut interest rates for a 3rd time,” Dec. 11, 2025.

  • 20

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Sep. 30, 2025. Based on the year-over-year percent change in the US Consumer Price Index (CPI), which peaked in Aug. 2022. Latest data available.

  • 21

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Sep. 30, 2025, based on the cumulative advance in the US Consumer Price Index (CPI) since August 2022. Latest data available.

  • 22

    Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Sep. 30, 2025, based on US real average hourly earnings. Latest data available.

  • 23

    Source: Reuters, “ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base - analyst note,” Feb. 2, 2023.

  • 24

    Sources: Bloomberg, L.P. and Invesco Strategy & Insights, Dec. 12, 2025. Earnings are measured by EBITDA, earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization. Hyperscalers are large tech-native businesses with deep cloud computing resources. The mention of individual securities is not intended to constitute or construe an investment recommendation.

  • 25

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025, based on fed funds implied rates.

  • 26

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025, based on the average spread between the 10-year US Treasury Rate and the fed funds rate since 1990.

  • 27

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Dec. 16, 2025. The 10-year US Treasury Rate has been trading above 4.10% and below 4.20% since Dec. 4, 2025.

  • 28

    Sources: Bloomberg, L.P. and Mortgage Bankers Association, Dec. 16, 2025, based on the average spread between the 30-year average US mortgage rate and the 10-year US Treasury since 1990.

  • 29

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Nov. 30, 2025, based on the leverage ratios of the companies in the Bloomberg US Corporate Bond Index.

  • 30

    Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, based on GDPNow, which seeks to forecast the growth rate of US real gross domestic product (GDP) before the official estimates are released by the government.

success failure

Fresh insights, delivered

Get the latest information and insights from our portfolio managers, market strategists, and investment experts.  

Fresh insights, delivered
Topic preference Please select one or more topics

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

When you interact with us, we may collect information about you which constitutes personal data under applicable laws and regulations. Our privacy notice explains how we use and protect your personal data.