Markets and Economy

Keeping long-term perspective as the Iran conflict continues

Aerial shot of a long bridge over a lake.

Key takeaways

Historical context

1

When geopolitical conflicts emerge, the first step is to step back and consider history to establish context.

Economic indicators

2

Today, the US economy remains in a relative position of strength, according to recent leading indicators.

Hedging risks

3

Exposure to oil and other commodities may help hedge the risks of a prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Never talk to a pitcher during a no-hitter. I’m not one to believe in jinxes, but this is a superstition that I follow. I made a similar comment a week ago as our team was reaffirming the views we’d laid out in our 2026 outlook, which we began composing in the fall. At the time, the global economy had solid momentum,1 inflation appeared contained,2 and the Federal Reserve (Fed) looked poised to lower interest rates after most of the rest of the world had already begun to ease. The conclusions we came to in our outlook appeared straightforward. We favored cyclical sectors, mid- and small-cap stocks, and non-US dollar assets. Two months don’t make a year, but as of February 27, our calls were on point,3 confidence was building, and the proverbial no-hitter was underway. But on February 28, the conflict involving Iran began and threw a curveball.

What past military conflicts meant for markets

When geopolitical conflicts emerge, the first step is to step back and consider history to establish context. Often, stock markets have delivered positive returns in the year following major conflicts.4 The 1991 Gulf War and the 2003 war between the US and Iraq are often-cited examples.

Investors sometimes point to the Yom Kippur War in 1973 or the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022 as cases where markets were lower a year later. In both of those instances, however, the economy was entering the conflict from a position of weakness. In each case, US inflation was above 7% at the outset.5 Policy tightening has tended to end business cycles. Geopolitical shocks usually don’t.

US economy at the start of the conflict

Today, we believe the US economy remains in a relative position of strength. Leading indicators released this week, including the ISM Purchasing Managers Manufacturing and Services indexes, showed services continuing to lead and manufacturing recovering toward expansionary territory.6 Prices paid within manufacturing were elevated, as expected in an environment shaped by tariffs,7 but broader inflation expectations remained contained.8 That containment likely gives the Fed room to lower interest rates.

Hiring data for February was weak, influenced by winter storms and disruptions in the health care sector, but the more important signal was the absence of rising layoffs.9 A labor market that is weakening but not collapsing keeps monetary policy in play. Taken together, the data likely continue to support risk assets in our view.

Implications of Iran conflict 

As we worked through the implications, one scenario stood out as particularly concerning and not implausible. It involved a prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a widening conflict that materially disrupted energy production across Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and a sustained increase in oil and natural gas prices. We’d expect such an outcome to undermine economic activity and push inflation higher. The keywords are prolonged and sustained. No one knows how long the current situation will last. At the same time, most investors operate with a time horizon that’s likely to extend well beyond any temporary disruption in energy markets.

There are also clear and established ways to help hedge these risks. Exposure to oil and natural gas may help offset higher energy prices. Other commodities transported through the Strait of Hormuz, including aluminum and grains, may play a similar role. Gold may potentially serve as a hedge against geopolitical risk, and the US dollar may strengthen in periods of global stress. It’s entirely reasonable for investors to manage and hedge these risks within their portfolios.

And yet, we still don’t see the typical signals that mark the end of a business cycle. For example, credit spreads remain tight.10 The outlook may not feel as comfortable as it did a week ago, and we are looking closely for signs of strain in our preferred indicators.

Keeping a long-term view

The outlook for the year ahead may not feel as comfortable as it did a week ago, and we’re looking closely for signs of strain in our preferred indicators. For now, we hedge risks where appropriate, stay disciplined, and remind ourselves that long-term investing requires sticking with a plan even when the crowd gets nervous.

What to watch this week

Date

Region

Event

Why it matters

March 9

China

Consumer Price Index (CPI) release

Key inflation data affecting global markets

 

Japan

Gross domestic product (GDP) figures

Economic growth indicator

March 10

US

Existing home sales (Feb.)

Housing market indicator

March 11

Germany

CPI release

Inflation gauge

 

UK

Bank of England inflation report hearings

Monetary policy insights

 

US

CPI (Feb.)

Key inflation data

March 12

UK

Bank of England Governor speech

Policy signals

 

US

Producer Price Index (PPI)

Producer inflation

March 13

Canada

Labor market data (Feb.)

Employment conditions

 

US

GDP Q4 secondary estimate

Economic growth view

 

US

Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE)

Inflation measure

 

US

Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index

Consumer outlook

  • 1

    Source: Conference Board, Feb. 2026, based on the Conference Board US Leading Economic Indicators.

  • 2

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Feb. 28, 2026, based on the five-year US Treasury inflation breakeven rate. A breakeven inflation rate is a market-derived estimate of future inflation, calculated by comparing the yield on a standard government bond (nominal) to the yield on a Treasury Inflation-Protected security (TIPS) of the same maturity.

  • 3

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Feb. 28, 2026, based on the year-to-date return differentials between the S&P 500 Cyclical Sectors Index versus the S&P 500 Defensive Sectors Index, the S&P Midcap 400 Index, and the S&P 500 Index; the MSCI All Country World Index ex-US; and the S&P 500 Index.

  • 4

    Source: Economic Policy Uncertainty, Dec. 31, 2024. The Caldara and Iacoviello Geopolitical Risk Index reflects automated text-search results of the electronic archives of 10 newspapers: Chicago Tribune, the Daily Telegraph, Financial Times, The Globe and Mail, The Guardian, the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post. Caldara and Iacoviello calculate the index by counting the number of articles related to adverse geopolitical events in each newspaper for each month (as a share of the total number of news articles). The conflicts and the S&P 500 return 12 months after the peak in the Geopolitical Risk Index were: 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis (35.3%), 1967 Six-Day War (13.3%), 1973 Yom Kippur War (-28.8%), 1979-1989 USSR/Afghanistan (8.2%), 1982 Falkland Islands (49.1%), 1990 Iraq/Kuwait (26.9%), 1991 Persian Gulf War (22.6%), 2001 September 11 (-20.4%), 2003 US/Iraq (35.0%), 2022 Russia/Ukraine (-6.7%), 2023 Israel/Hamas (34.1). An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

  • 5

    Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Feb. 2026, based on the US Consumer Price Index.

  • 6

    Source: Institute for Supply Management, Feb. 2026.

  • 7

    Source: Institute for Supply Management, Feb. 2026.

  • 8

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Feb. 28, 2026, based on the five-year US Treasury inflation breakeven rate.

  • 9

    Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Feb. 2026, based on US nonfarm payrolls and initial jobless claims, respectively.

  • 10

    Source: Bloomberg, L.P. March 5, 2026, based on the option-adjusted spread of the Bloomberg US Corporate Bond Index.