Enhance your business
Grow your practice and optimize your team’s performance in a complex and competitive environment.
A smaller client roster may free up time and resources to better serve those clients in many ways.
Grouping clients based on key attributes may create personalization, potentially benefiting both wealth managers and clients.
Technology may create operational efficiency and, through digital engagement, drive differentiation.
We believe bigger is better except when it’s not. We have seen that wealth management practices sometimes feel pressure to add clients in order to grow their bottom line. But fewer clients may be the right route to a profitable roster. According to Practice Innovation Index (PII) respondents, top-performing wealth managers are prioritizing personalization, segmentation, and consistent engagement, forgoing roster size in favor of quality service. How are they reaping the benefits?
Better client service in our experience strengthens relationships and drives long-term client loyalty. But we believe more individualized attention necessitates fewer clients. Financial professionals manage 162 clients on average according to PII data. That number drops to 126 for top-quartile managers who serve high-net-worth households. Each individual client, on average, is more profitable.
A smaller client roster may offer advantages. It may free up time and resources to serve those clients. Half of all top-performing practices engage clients at least eight times per year, sometimes more, according to PII respondents. PII data indicates about 20% of top practices are in touch on 11 or more occasions each year. That’s in our view a striking difference from bottom-tier practices, who report contact with even their best clients no more than five times per year.
High-level engagement is, in our view, a point of differentiation. That engagement may range from long-term planning to regular check-ins to periodic reassurances in a bumpy economy. A wealth management firm might also provide boutique services like tax planning and trust services, for example. And then there are the unique issues that generally arise during a financial professional-client relationship.
In our view, practices that hope to maintain high engagement must develop strong servicing models. An ensemble style, with defined roles and specialists to perform functions in line with their expertise, may help support this strategy. A pod-based service structure assigns a team of financial professionals to serve a set of clients. While either approach may reduce contact between a specific financial professional and a specific client, both may allow for a closer relationship between the firm and a client.
According to PII respondents, top-performing wealth managers are prioritizing personalization. Among them, 92% offer a personalized or customized service model, compared to just 30% of survey respondents who use a generic approach. The goal, in part, is to give a differentiated experience, which may strengthen a relationship and lead to long-term client loyalty. Segmentation, dividing clients into groups based on key attributes, might be the answer. This sort of grouping may benefit both wealth managers and clients.
Segmentation may help wealth managers more effectively guide their clients. Smaller client groupings may allow for deeper insights into the specific needs of each group. The financial professional may then work to effectively communicate with messaging that resonates and improves engagement. More effective service can also evolve to be more efficient with standardized yet personalized strategies. Customized guidance may be delivered in less time, and resources then reallocated where they might be more profitable. Improved efficiency and service may help retain clients and push up revenue. And best of all, this approach is scalable.
Unsurprisingly in our view, segmentation may present significant upside for clients as well. More relevant guidance better aligns with a client’s goals and is more effectively delivered will likely not be viewed as a waste of their time. Quite the opposite, it may improve client trust in their financial professional. A satisfied client may enjoy peace of mind, knowing their financial future is likely in good hands.
Client segmentation may help wealth managers give each client the right amount of service. According to PII respondents, the best-performing wealth managers divvy up their roster using quantitative measures, like revenue and time spent, and qualitative measures, like life stage and behavioral profile. Such groupings may allow wealth managers to align goals across clients. They may then give more personal and relevant guidance to more people. The goal is that relationships improve, trust grows, and time, overall, is better spent.
Technology, and the digital engagement it enables, matters in the financial professional-client relationship. While it’s standard across the industry, we have seen that expectations have been rising and use can vary. According to PII respondents, almost 96% of top-tier practices hold virtual reviews and use video conferencing as compared to 60% of bottom-tier practices. According to the PII data, leading practices also tend to give clients access to research platforms (Morningstar, Bloomberg) and portfolio analytics tools. Customer relationship management systems (CRMs) may help wealth managers personalize messaging and service models by segment and stay consistent in their communications.
Technology may also serve the firm and ultimately the client in less visible but no less important ways. Segmentation tools that categorize clients by various metrics may help support personalization. Financial planning software may help serve financial professionals when modeling scenarios and forecasting outcomes, while portfolio management tools may help keep portfolios balanced and optimized. Advanced analytics may help manage risk, help identify possible situations and help adjust proactively.
We believe technology is more than a tool for operational efficiency; it may help drive differentiation. We have seen that leading practices leverage technology thoughtfully and deliver convenient and high-touch client experiences. Firms that invest in advanced digital capabilities, portfolio analytics, and research tools are in our view more equipped to deliver better service at scale, meet the expectations of increasingly tech-savvy clients, and position themselves as partners in their clients’ financial lives.
Enhance your business
Grow your practice and optimize your team’s performance in a complex and competitive environment.
Practice Innovation Index
Introducing the Practice Innovation Index powered by Cerulli Associates: setting the benchmark for high-performing financial professionals.
How to keep your best clients
It's not the clients you win; it's the clients you keep. Our business-building program, The Golden Hour, shares how to use a “golden” touch to help you keep at-risk clients.
This report leverages insights from practices that participated in the Practice Innovation Index 1/1/2023 – 06/30/2025. See how top practices are implementing a more holistic and personal approach to financial planning.
Important information
NA5130384
Image: alvaro gonzalez / Getty
The “Practice Innovation Index” program is based on Invesco Global Consulting’s work with Cerulli Associates. Invesco Distributors, Inc. is affiliated with neither Cerulli Associates nor Cerulli, Inc.
Invesco Global Consulting programs are for illustrative, informational and educational purposes. We make no guarantee that participation in any programs or utilization of their content will result in increased business for any financial professional. Invesco Global Consulting programs are offered through Invesco Distributors, Inc., which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Invesco Ltd.
Invesco Distributors, Inc. does not offer all services referenced herein. Offer services only as appropriate and applicable.
Practice Innovation Index diagnostic survey results cover responses from 2,385 participants from 01/1/2023-6/30/2025. Participant respondents represent multiple channels including wirehouses, national and regional broker/dealers (B/Ds), independent B/Ds, independent registered investment advisors (RIAs), hybrid RIAs, retail bank B/Ds, and insurance B/Ds. Respondents are categorized into quartiles based on total PII scores, which range from 0 to 140 points. The top quartile (Q4) includes scores of 99 and above, the third quartile (Q3) includes scores from 89 to 98, the second quartile (Q2) includes scores from 80 to 88, and the bottom quartile (Q1) includes scores 79 and below. References to “top-quartile,” “high-performing,” or “leading” practices indicate those in the top 25% of PII respondents, while “bottom-quartile” or “lowest-performing” refers to the bottom 25% of respondents.
Platinum clients: top 10% clients ranked qualitatively and quantitatively.
Gold clients: top 11-25% clients ranked qualitatively and quantitatively.
Silver clients: top 26-50% clients ranked qualitatively and quantitatively.
Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco investment professionals.
All data created by Invesco Global Consulting unless otherwise noted.
Note: Not all products, materials or services available at all firms. Financial professionals should contact their home offices.
This link takes you to a site not affiliated with Invesco. The site is for informational purposes only. Invesco does not guarantee nor take any responsibility for any of the content.